🔗 Share this article

As the political power of Donald Trump diminishes and his behavior grows increasingly volatile, there has been an escalation in vitriolic attacks aimed at women in media and racial minorities, with Somali Americans as a recent focal point. The impact of these insults stems from their malice and his platform, not their factual accuracy. Similarly, his administration's offensive against immigrants are haphazard and founded on falsehoods. It is abundantly clear that the objective is not targeting individuals with criminal histories. The true target is people of color.

This includes Indigenous peoples carrying tribal IDs to naturalized US citizens, from essential workers in construction and healthcare to those who served, college students, residents asleep in their beds, and toddlers: a wide array of the country's population is under siege.

"ICE operations are brutal, inhumane and achieve nothing for community security," asserts a leading political figure from New York. Scenes featuring masked agents breaking car glass and dragging parents away from infants, terrorizing entire communities and disrupting schools and businesses, undermines safety entirely.

These waves of calculated hatred—focusing on people from Haiti in the 2024 campaign, Venezuelans this year, and most recently Somali Americans—rely extensively on defamatory falsehoods and slurs. The reason is simple: the truthful data about these groups of people cannot support such hostility.

The Mythical Nation of White People Versus Actual History

This campaign of terror and demonization purports to aim at recreating a homogeneously white America which is a fiction. While the US was demographically whiter in the mid-20th century, it was never exclusively a "white country". At the nation's founding, the thirteen founding colonies contained a substantial percentage of Black and Indigenous peoples—certain states in the South were over one-third Black.

When the United States expanded, taking Texas in the 1840s and seizing Mexico's northern territories in 1848, it absorbed a vast Spanish-speaking population already living across the modern Southwest and California. Historical records show the first African Muslim in this land arrived with a Spanish expedition nearly a century before the Mayflower English Puritans landed in Massachusetts in 1620.

Demographic Realities Against Forced Dreams

The persecution of huge populations of people of color and even mass deportations cannot fabricate the all-white nation of far-right dreams. Los Angeles, for instance, is close to 50% Hispanic, and regardless of aggressive enforcement, detentions and removals, its character persists. The city's very name is Spanish, an ongoing testament of its original inhabitants.

The entirety of this animus and oppression looks like the fear of bigots who pretend they can halt the demographic future of a country no longer majority-white through sheer brutality.

This is paired with an attack on abortion access that is, at times, openly intended to prompt Caucasian women to bear more babies. The rationale cites a below-replacement birthrate in the US, a trend less impactful than in other countries due to a hard-working population of immigrant laborers which keeps the economy functioning. However, instead of offering the social support that might make raising children easier, the approach is punitive and coercive.

An noted writer observes that the policies on childbirth espoused by figures like JD Vance—coupled with derogatory comments toward childless women—constitute a form of pronatalism. This ideology "usually combines concerns over falling fertility with opposition to immigration and anti-feminist ideas."

Similarly, reporting indicates that "efforts to bolster the fertility rate cannot make up for broader policies aimed at slashing government assistance initiatives like healthcare for the poor and insurance for kids. The so-called 'pro-family' focus is not just for encouraging procreation. Instead, it is being weaponized to advance a conservative agenda that threatens the health of women, reproductive rights, and labor force involvement."

Contradictory Strategies and Widespread Resistance

The combination of anti-immigration and pronatalist policies constitute an effort to artificially redirect the country's population future. In the end, both amount to foolish bullying by proponents of hate who inadvertently reveal that their assertions of being better must be based on skin color and sex; without these constructs, their arguments collapse into meaningless idiocy.

A lot of the reasoning offered by the Trump team fails to align with tangible facts and actual outcomes. For example, maritime attacks in the Caribbean Sea frequently focus on tiny boats which are not proven to be carrying narcotics and not able of making it to the United States. Likewise, Venezuela's involvement in fentanyl trafficking is minimal, and its involvement with cocaine is much smaller than that of other South American nations.

The administration's stance extends to environmental policy, with a dismissal of "climate change ideology" and "Net Zero goals." There is a sentimental commitment to fossil fuels, particularly coal, leading to policies that force communities to spend money on obsolete and toxic energy sources while undermining affordable, clean alternatives. Concurrently, public health leadership have promoted anti-scientific dietary schemes while weakening general public health safeguards.

The foundational assumption of the anti-immigrant offensive is that people of color not born in the US are threatening outsiders. However, across the nation—in cities like L.A. and Charlotte, Chicago to Portland—the government's own forces, the ICE and Border Patrol officers, whom local communities perceive as the dangerous and hostile interlopers.

No symbol is more powerful of the broad repudiation of these tactics than the thousands of people mobilizing, demonstrating, risking safety and arrest to defend their neighbors. Municipality after municipality has risen up in defense of its residents. No amount of derogatory language or intimidation can alter this fundamental truth.