🔗 Share this article

The true crime genre has an innovative format, or perhaps even a completely fresh vocabulary and structure: officer-worn camera recordings. Faces of victims, witnesses and possible perpetrators loom up to the cameras, sometimes in the intense brightness of vehicle beams or flashlights as the officers approach, their expressions and tones eloquent of wariness or panic or anger or dubiously feigned naivety. And we often incidentally glimpse the faces of the officers themselves, one waiting impassively while the other asks the questions with what occasionally seems like remarkable hesitation – though maybe this is because they know they are being recorded.

A Growing Trend in Non-Fiction Cinema

We have previously seen the streaming service true-crime documentary American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the killing of an social media personality by her partner, whose main point of interest was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed surprisingly lenient with the perpetrator. There is also the acclaimed short film Incident by Bill Morrison, made exclusively of officer footage. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the grim case of Ajike Owens in Ocala, Florida, a African American woman whose children allegedly harassed and tormented her white neighbour, Susan Lorincz. In 2023, after an increasing number of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the authorities were repeatedly called, Lorincz fatally shot Owens through her closed front door, when the victim went to the neighbor's residence to confront her about hurling items at her children.

The Investigation and Legal Context

The investigating authorities found proof that Lorincz had done online research into the state's self-defense statutes, which allow householders and others to use firearms if there is a reasonable belief of threat. The movie constructs its narrative with the officer recordings captured during the repeated police visits to the scene before the killing, and then at the horrific and chaotic incident site itself – prefaced by 911 audio material of the caller contacting authorities in a dramatically trembling voice. There is also police cell footage of the individual which has a chilly, queasy fascination.

Depiction of the Suspect

The documentary does not really imply anything too complex about Lorincz, or any extenuating circumstance. She is obviously disturbed, although the kids are heard calling her “the Karen”, an hurtful taunt. The production is presented as an illustration of how self-defense regulations lead to unnecessary and heartbreaking violence. But the fact of firearm possession and the constitutional right (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a late commentator famously claimed made firearm fatalities a necessary cost) is not much emphasized.

Officer Questioning and Gun Culture

It is feasible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel surprised at how little interest the officers took in this aspect. At what time did she purchase the firearm? Where (if anywhere) did she train in its use? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? Where did she store it in the house? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The police aren’t shown asking any of these surely relevant questions (though they could have inquired in recordings that were not included). Or is possessing a firearm so commonplace it would be like asking about microwaves or bread heaters?

Detention and Consequences

For what appeared to her local residents a very long time, the suspect was not even taken into custody and indicted, only held and even offered a hotel stay away from home for the night (another parallel, incidentally, with the Gabby Petito case). And when she was ultimately officially taken into custody in the holding cell, there is an remarkable scene in which the individual simply declines to rise, will not extend her arms for the cuffs, not hostilely, but with the politely self-pitying air of someone whose psychological state means that she is unable to comply. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point led her to think that this could be effective?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It didn’t; and the panel's decision is revealed in the closing credits. A deeply sobering picture of American crime and punishment.